Wrong Reality Logo

WRONG REALITY Part VII REALISATION

PREPARING THE WAY FOR CHANGE

46 NEW ATTITUDE

Having reoriented ourselves so that our automated outer shells are put aside, to be progressively discredited, we now face the world anew, supraconsciously, with a humantrue attitude.

We take the fundamental view that whether or not Earth humanity ever achieves it, humantrue supraconsciousness is our true nature and state. We do not accept counter-arguments relating to false automatic concepts, even though they accurately apply to existing reality, because they are truly irrelevant. This is our approach, and we judge all things by supraconscious reason, regardless of the here and now. Understanding that we live in a lunatic reality, we now recognise that this reality cannot be supported by true reason. Therefore we doubt any reason given in its support.

We have to acknowledge that presently the vast majority of human beings, from top to bottom of the hierarchy - most of the few with whom we come into direct contact, the many who claim our indirect attention, and the millions beyond our ken - are thinking falsely, not intellating, not complete, and vitally needing to become supraconsciously aware of humantruth. Though they overwhelmingly outnumber us, we nevertheless know that it is they who are out of step with truth. We are absolutely adamant in our opposition to, and rejection of, automatic reality, proof against its blandishments, secure in the clear and undeniable awareness that the Machine is false through and through.

Yet that which at first distinguishes us from our automated brothers and sisters may be little more than that we cannot sit by and let the world be as it is. Therefore we must take on trust the need to strive for supraconsciousness, for we cannot be aware of truth before it reaches our awareness. And eventually they will have to do the same, if humanity isto achieve a humantrue reality, for this great change will not come about without the agreement of all.

Part of that vital striving for supraconsciousness is that we do not allow ourselves to be the product of reckless instinct, of automatic conditioning, of wishful thinking - of anything but the true moral awareness of supraconsciously fulfilled intellect. Another essential part is to acknowledge that we support no further material progress that is not humantruly necessary, for the ultimate objective of our progressive development of body and brain - the postconscious intellectual faculty - has already been achieved.

We should not be beguiled by the social convention that it is admirable to keep smiling despite everything. To look on the bright side means turning your back on the black side - temporarily a good thing, perhaps, but bad in the long term. To square up to the bad is presently distressing, and can be depressing, but it works for the long-term good.

We turn against the norm, but realise that there is no logic in resisting the Machine and trying humantruly to simplify our way of life, except for the logic of our own inner responsible supraconscious awareness, which shows that if there is to be any real change, allmust change. The whole Machine is our present reality, and automatic views, policies, statements and analyses from its human hierarchy are its accompaniments, in which the humantrue reason of the individual mind has no place or voice. We shall not achieve change by cutting ourselves off from the world and leaving it be. Taking a new attitude, we now intend to make the individual mind our onlyvoice, showing the world there is no place for automatic reason.

We so firmly believe in humantruth, and envisage it as possible and probable of achievement, that we really shallgo on and try, to the best of our ability and above all else, to realise it in the world. When it comes to the crunch we can bear to stand out from the norm, make sacrifices, and risk ridicule and failure. We have the mental strength of supraconscious conviction not only to turn our backs on automatic reality and all its pressures and persuasions, but also to go much further and positively promote humantruth as its vitally necessary alternative.

We have the strength to insist on family, social, economic and national ties giving way to the pursuit of humantruth - on putting our own, our childrens', and our childrens' childrens' feet on the ladder of supraconscious awareness for the future good of all, rather than on the Machine ladder for our, and their present exclusive personal benefit. Given our new attitude, awakened intellectual enthusiasm can overcome conventional opposition, the disapproval of our peers, our own ego, or our elderly aches and pains and weariness, so that we make humantruth our living faith and aim. We shall not allow our family and friends, our national prejudice or our automatic advantages to dissuade us.

We might be forgiven for thinking that changing our minds is one thing, but bringing that new understanding to bear on the world, and change it,is quite another. Difficult as it is, to make that personal internal reorientation may seem easy compared with the task of the individual, powerless and alone, in overturning the huge, hard world of the Machine. But we dohave potential power, for all humanity is made up of individuals upon whom the Machine depends. Though most of us are not in an individual position of automatic power to give our words or actions special significance, our united individual power is much greater.

Our new attitude is that the Machine and its institutions are not to be taken seriously, and we should cease weighing our lives in their scales. So when we consider our own standard and style of living we should not judge it by the amount of money the Machine affords us to spend, or by that concept of reality which gives us the right to earn it as we may and spend it as we wish. It should be judged by what the whole Earth can afford equally to every human individual, and whether what we put in and take out reflects our individual, humantrue responsibility to the whole.

We should beware that the more we obey the Machine's ethic the more we expect its aids and conveniences and the more our reality depends on using them. Eventually, if we fail nowto begin overturning the Machine, though it dispenses with ourlabour we shall be unable to do without its technology. We shall have forgotten how, or be unwilling, or be forbidden,to return to simple ways and the use of our own manual skills to fend for ourselves, or of utilisingwhat technology humantruly benefits us, rather than being mastered and used by it.

We should not expect truth from any politician or servant of any automatic institution. If we are politicians or serve institutions we should recognise that this is so - admit to our awareness that the statements we make, the policies we follow, the beliefs we support were not honestly created or accepted by our own intellation but imposed on our conscious thinking by the limited laws of our institution and its factions, by automatic lores, and by money-economic and other pressures to conform to the existing norm.

Government is subject to the competitive conflict of politics which alters it superficially but without changing its founding automatic function. It will not be changed radically as a Machine institution by opposition from the political institution because both serve the same automatic ethic. Meaningful change can come about only by the common enlightment of all individuals, including individual members of governments, and the function of government will then be sensibly changed to the point of abandonment when world humanity abandons the Machine.

Exceptional obstacles to growing awareness are the accepted practices fundamental to existing reality. They have the effect of preventing individuals from determining their own minds in a humantrue way, divide humanity from itself, and allow or compel governments to make big decisions, of huge or traumatic effect worldwide, independently of and remote from the free inner morality of each and every individual who together make up all humanity which governments are supposed to represent. No national authority could reasonably object or refuse to accede to humantrue reforming changes when they are in the true inerests of all individuals of all nations without tacitly admitting that their authority is wielded against or despite those interests.

A major obstacle is education. It is not the case that the less you are educated the more difficult you will find the process of reasoning and knowing. You will find it less easy to absorb conformist learning but, ifyou make the required effort, your mind, free from false conditioning, or from formations of half-true past thinking which causes inability to think truly in the present, will think, or rather intellate, truly. It is certainly possiblefor the individual mind to submit to conventional upbringing, conformist education, and experience of life in the Machine, and yet subsequently also to rise above and reject this conditioning, and to intellate. But this is difficult to do, and to reach supraconsciousness from such beginnings may take a very long time. Why should we allow that in order to develop our intellect truly we have to reject the norm and unlearn what it taught us? Why should we accept that children continue to be fitted with these blinkers which, without true guidance, they mostly fail ever to remove?

It is not to be expected that the Machine's institutions will voluntarily change. But we ought to expect the educational institutions to include introduction to humantrue alternative philosophy in their curriculae from the beginning. If authority believes automatic reality to be inescapably right it cannot but believe that any angle of scrutiny will fail to arrive at any other conclusion. In any case there is no good reason why education should not be a free human, rather than government, responsibility. As with religion - if the hierarchy is sure of its belief it ought to allow disbelief all the room it requires, confident that it shall soon be corrected. We may believe in automatic reality, or that it cannot be escaped, but that does not give us the right to force our conditioning on our children, to disallow them access to all versions of belief and opinion, to all relative 'truths', and to deny their right to open their minds to humantruth.

This proposal might be seen by some as subversive of the State, but in the humantrue view it is the State - that is to say the worldwide Machine and all the various institutions grown from it - which is subverting human intellect. When a world humantrue society has come into being, the meaning of the word 'education' will be very different, as has already been suggested. A prominent undertaking of a humantrue constitution has to be that every individual be taught from the outset that she or he has a mind to be fulfilled, and that responsibility for humanity is hers or his.

We recognise that education, by stimulating us to varying degrees, selecting us, inculcating specific knowledge and preconceived reason into our minds, and progressing this intellectual conditioning to an appropriate range of levels, thus prepares us to be available to perform an automatic function. We see that it does nothelp, encourage or enable us to intellate, to achieve supraconscious awareness, to understand the true nature and state of human being, and so to seek and find present and future, individual and collective, humantrue fulfilment.

We understand that the rot has to stop, for our mutation into a fully intellectual species is rightful. If individuals like you and me do not stop it now, then it is highly probable that humanity never will, for those who follow us, even if they have more pressing cause than we, will have ever less opportunity if, indeed, they survive to have any opportunity at all. It really is up to us. In particular it is up to us as parents to sacrifice our wishes, and fears, for our childrens' automatic futures and prepare them, however painful for them or us, for a humantrue future.

We intend to repair our intellectual shortcomings, and teach our young humantruly rather than prepare them for the same pitfalls into which we were led to stumble. The failure of existing human society is that being in a pit and having every good reason to climb out, few individuals do so, because most are busy making out reasons why, beingin that unsavoury automatic pit, they oughtto be in it, remain in it, and make the best of it because that is where they belong. Many wise people have made out that no other conclusion is possible. But, apart from this common negative view, they all disagree, which clearly indicates that their minds are incomplete. We allow such ill-considered prejudice to bind and gag us. What we should do, before reaching any conclusions, is to get our intellation complete, true and agreed.

Although we recognise the great importance of making our children humantruly aware, and do our very best to this end, how are we to succeed? Our real problem is in founding the child mind in the first five years of life, before school (so that it can withstand the influence of school), and especially in the first two years or so, before there is verbal communication. We and the child exist in this present reality, and the child learns by what it sees, hears and feels. What it experiences is the here and now, and our efforts to cope. Is it possible to avoid these first years being spent by the child in absorbing the basic facts and concepts of automatic reality? As a society we do not even know how to treat and guide babies properly in the context of the Machine, so we are hardly fitted for leading them towards humantruth despite the Machine.

A great deal of research is already being done into the subject, with the object of adapting the child to the norm. It is a false process because the objective is false. It aims to teach the child to deny anti-social original instinct, yet not to replace it with behaviour indicated by intellect, but in many ways to divert that instinct into competitive, anti-human channels which are concentric to the Machine and thus acceptable to present society. Alternative, independent intellation is needed into ways of treating babies fundamentally as embryonic humantrue intellects - of setting them on the difficult path to supraconsciousness, eccentric to the norm, and keeping them on it as best we can in unfavourable circumstances. It will be a relatively simple and straightforward matter when we already live in a humantrue reality.

I have said that, whatever its circumstances, any single healthy mind is potentially capable, with independent effort, of judging and understanding the essential truth about human society, as it is and as it should be. So whatever influences our children are subject to, if they are to become humantrue the vital thing is not that they be conditioned by teaching but that their free and independent mental activity be stimulated to the optimum so as to realise its full, and therefore true potential, despite false influences.


Other exceptional obstacles to the growth of humantrue awareness and the unity of humankind, which divide us from ourselves, are the diversity of languages in the world and our separation into nations each with its sovereign authority. Also this automatic reality's definition of right and wrong, and its concept of crime.

Humantrue awareness turns our existing concept of crime upside down, showing crime to be human lawbreaking, but revealing that the law protects the interests of the Machine rather than of humanity. It shows us that wrong motives call up our passion for wrong causes, and that humanity's inhumanity is not our true nature unfolding but an automatic phenomenon - that crime as we know it is the product of competitive inequality, a reaction between the yearning of human being for fulfilment and the Machine's perversion and conversion of that yearning into its own desires, which it then encourages and liberally rewards, or contains and limites, or frustrates and denies. It shows that the present main framework of our lives is a crime against humanity. As supraconscious individuals, we now recognise the Machine as the criminal cause of inhumanity, and determine to replace it with the humantrue alternative.

We value the individual moral code above the code of law. We will not act in terms of automatic lore, though it be lawful, but are guided by humantrue ideals which do not need the control of law. We do not take the law as fixed, but to be constantly re-assessed as humanity changes. We should not regard it as the proper shaper of human behaviour, but as a control made necessary by past human automatic behaviour. Laws are made by human society and so should be obeyed by humans, even though contrary to humantruth, but only until our society, with our help, becomes responsible enough that the worst laws may be abolished, and then that all law is rendered unnecessary by replacement with voluntary supraconscious responsibility to a humantrue constitution.

For the same reasons we no longer need the obligations and promises of religion. We are now determined to abandon all faiths in mystic powers outside ourselves. We do not find it possible to argue with or hold aloof from the challenge to make good our life on Earth by ourselves, building a reality of cooperative love and compassion. We recognise no grounds for believing in any higher power or purpose. or for preferring any vague promise of better things in some fantastic life hereafter.


We do not discriminate between individuals on grounds of sex, age, mental agility, colour, race, condition, nation, but recognise all as having similar needs and potentially similar minds. We look on all women and men as humantrue by nature, and have faith in our collective power to change the institutions of this reality from within. We respect individuals as ordinary human beings, but whilst we value humantrue virtue as a gift, we also sympathise with iniquity as a misfortune. We do not respect rank, position or status but seek to remove the Machine's differentiations of privilege and power, just as we expect to abolish the degredation of underprivilege and helplessness. We do not accept that such differences are an argument against the viability of the humantrue ideal but as the products of a reality which has not achieved, nor sought to achieve that ideal. To continue click here